Podcast: Play in new window | Download
On Friday, at the UN Climate Conference (COP15) in Copenhagen, Deputy Chair of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) Crispin S. Gregoire from Dominica announced the release of draft amendments to the Kyoto Protocol. The draft, which advances the Tuvalu Proposal, seeks to stimulate negotiation toward adoption of a complimentary treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol when it expires in 2012. The amendments re-allocate responsibilities for addressing climate change to match their contributions to the crisis.
“All countries have a responsibility but the historically responsible countries are the ones we focus on,” Gregoire told Sea Change Radio Climate Correspondent Cimbria Badenhausen. “The developed countries have not met their responsibilities.” Another goal of the amendments is to create a treaty that will keep the small island states from drowning beneath rising sea levels due to climate change. Already, island populations are becoming climate refugees; for example, Tuvalu residents consider migration to Australia, and Maldivians are moving to islands at higher elevation, according to Gregoire. Another problem for island nations is fisheries moving to warmer waters. Gregoire stated that AOSIS felt “emphatically” that temperatures must rise no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, “no warmer than 1.5 because our corals will all disappear. Two degrees, our corals are dead.”
Cimbria asked Gregoire about what it means for heads of state to attend this climate conference. She pointed out that this is the first time heads of state have joined the negotiation, and wanted to know how this will be handled. Gregoire explained, “ultimately the negotiators are working for the policy makers, they get their instructions from the political directories. The fact that the leaders are coming is unprecedented because never before have at the highest level taken so much interest in this. It’s because every single country is affected. The leaders, especially those coming from the developing countries, have come in to be sure that there are commitments, whether they are legally binding or not, but they are commitments, to help them with two things: one, how to adapt, which takes money, and what is the technology commitment that countries who have the technology, are they willing to transfer it, and I think there is a great willingness on the part of the countries with the technology. The question is, how is that technology going to be financed.”
Thanks to our COP15 Series Sponsor The Cloud Institute, as well as financial support from The ManKind Project and the Institute for Nature and Leadership, as well as other individuals.
If you found this post interesting, you might want to explore these topics also:
Climate Change, COP15, kyoto protocol, tuvalu proposal
It is so refreshing to have this type of in-depth analysis from on-the-ground in Copenhagen, especially given the simplified and generalized reporting we are receiving from the major news broadcasters.
This polarity between “developed” countries and “under-developed” countries, and what their fair but adequate role must be, has been a crux of our climate action impasse for too many years. The scientific community has made it clear that we cannot afford to delay commitments to a 350 action plan, and Ban Ki-moon has charged all countries and member states to forge a strong commitment towards that plan – THIS week, in Copenhagen, where I so wish I could be, but am grateful for the next best thing – Sea Change Radio dispatches from your climate correspondent, Cimbria Badenhausen.
Cimbria asked an important question – What does it mean that the heads of states are now arriving and will be participating in negotiations? And Gregoire, but it also means this – that conversations and dialog can move beyond that predetermined limits and “non-negotiable” aspects of the respective country’s climate contract with the rest of the world, and into more meaningful dialog that unfolds based on active listening to all parties. This type of authentic dialog is rare in international negotiations, but it is the only way to find solutions that are both fair and will respond appropriately to the crisis at hand.
Cimbria, demand that type of authentic dialog and keep up the AMAZING work – and keep the posts and podcasts coming as I must live vicariously through you!
Josh, thanks for following our coverage of COP15. It was an amazing experience, and I look forward to speaking with you more about it.