Chris Mooney: Inside The Republican Brain and Climate Denialism

If you’re listening to this show, chances are you believe that climate change is real, that it’s a problem, and that human actions have brought us to where we are today.

Some Sea Change Radio listeners are Democrats, some are Republicans, and a large number may not identify with either party – but all are probably pretty concerned about responsible environmental stewardship, irrespective of their specific political party affiliation.

There is one political party here in the United States, however, whose official position is to deny the threat of climate change and block any and all attempts to slow environmental degradation, in spite of the large body of scientific research that contradicts that position. Our guest this week on Sea Change Radio is Chris Mooney, whose book The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science — and Reality explores why so many Republicans refuse to accept things that most experts identify as factual. Mooney talks with host Alex Wise about the book, what he posits, and the research that backs him up.

If you found this post interesting, you might want to explore these topics also:
, , , ,

One Response to “Chris Mooney: Inside The Republican Brain and Climate Denialism”

  1. CraigLoeffelholz says:

    How about “Climate Destabilization”
    or Planet Destabilization?
    Degraded ecology. Destabilized Planet (natural occuring systems that support life)/ Climate / People / Eco / Ecology / Economy.

    re: Degradations caused by people’s (& corporate) actions based partly in that “Climate Change” can be easily “denied” (and, as in climate perspectives, is easily seen somewhat appropriately as ever-changing in some time frames – helps enable the science to be derailed thru faulty perspectives / mind and communicative framing – ie, I agree with the Sea Change expression that too many people believe the wrongly marketed non-science and the thoughts expressed and marketing used in it’s place is often a lot of skewed communication with toxic results).